Suche

Dienstag, 5. Juli 2011

PSP & NPPL mergen? - PSP Gerücht um geplante Fusion mit der NPPL

Was in der BRD seit ewigkeiten ein Thema ist, der Wunsch nach einer Liga, kommt auch alle Jahre wieder in den USA als Gerücht auf. Eine gemeinsame Major Liga für das Land. Diesmal bringen sich angeblich die großen Painthersteller ins Spiel und wolle eine Fusion (engl. Merge) vorran bringen. Ein Gerücht? Und was haltet ihr davon? Vor oder Nachteil?


Rumor: Paintball manufactures call for NPPL, PSP merger 

July 5, 2011 1:35 am 

ProPaintball insiders indicate that the big paintball manufactures (the guys making the paint) are suggesting that the major paintball leagues merge. According to a rumor floating around, the paintball companies want the National Professional Paintball League to merge with Paintball Sports Promotions in 2012 to reduce the amount of times they need to roll out the heavy duty/expensive event trucks. The rumor goes as far as to suggest the paintball manufactures are considering pulling their sponsorship of the leagues if a merger is not completed. 

GI Sports Paintball Truck 

The concept of a major league merger is not a new one. In fact, the “merger” rumor has shown its face for as long as many of us can remember. The issues preventing the leagues from merging boil down to a few key points; who and how much ownership everyone would hold in combined league, which format would survive, and, most of all, personal ego. 

For those of you unfamiliar, the NPPL is compromised of a group of pro teams who own various percentage interests in the league. The PSP is backed by Dave Dehaan, the owner of DYE Precision. Each league has its established customer base and feels that its format and operation is superior to that of the competition. 

Further, the NPPL owners want a seat at the decision making table (a position a core group of NPPL owners have held since 2007) in order to influence the course and direction of the league. The PSP is under the impression that they run a good show and that while a think tank might be good, there is no guarantee that those ideas will be implemented or taken into consideration.

Keine Kommentare:

Kommentar veröffentlichen